Istvan Szucs > wrote:
>
>JOzsi, aruld el milyen OS-t hasznalsz! Igerjuk hogy nem
>hasznaljuk ellened.

No ne mond!
Miert gondolod, hogy miattad majd elismetlem, amit mar megirtam?

> A legtobb billentyuzet atdefinialohoz
>tenyleg ket gombot kell megnyomni, de nem ekezetes
>betunkent, hanem ahanyszor oda es vissza akarsz valtani az
>angol es a magyar billentyuzet kozott. (They remap your
>keyboard)>

That's the problem! They remap even those keys I don't want to.
Like making Y and Z changing places, not to mention a bunch of
special characters.

Let's face it: it's unavoidable when using a keyboard made for a small
set of letters for a language with a larger letter set.  The solution
would be a keyboard with enough extra keys to map those accented
letters, so one does not have to be slowed down with different mappings.
But that's just dreaming.

>Szerintem maradjunk ekezet nelkul vagy hasznaljuk
>az a1 e1 o3 stb jelolest, esetleg a' e' o"-t irjunk az a
>legbiztonsagosabb.

Az a1, stb. jelolest a legnehezebb olvasni, s rendszerint at is szoktam
ugrani az olyan cikkeket.  Szerencsere sokat nem veszit veluk az ember,
mivel azok 95%-ban Kornaitol szarmaznak.  En az a' e', stb jelolest
utalom a legkevesbbe, s szoktam is hasznalni olyankor, amikor esetleg
felreertest okozna az ekezet hianya.  Pl. nemi kontra ne'mi. ;-)

Pannon J.

In article >  writes:
>Nem csak az ugy, de maga Tocsik hattere is erdekes lehet.  Tud valaki
>bovebbet errol?

A gyanús múltjára gondolsz? Erről ezt találtam:
        http://www.nepszabadsag.hu/Scripts/get_doc.idc?ID=4585&iid=145
---------------------- idézet eleje ----------------------
[...] a büntetőügyet a parlament hétfői ülésén említette Deutsch Tamás
képviselő. E dokumentumok szerint 1986. május 16-án egy magánszemély
meghatalmazta Tocsikot egy budapesti, XIII., Rajk László utcai egyszoba
összkomfortos öröklakás eladásával. [...] Egy 1988 márciusában kelt, a
Pesti Központi Kerületi Bírósághoz beadott keresetben az adásvételi
szerződést a meghatalmazó lakástulajdonos megtámadta, mivel állítása
szerint a szerződésen látható aláírás nem tőle származik, tehát hamisítás.
Büntetőügy is indult, és a bíróság 1990 májusában írásszakértőt rendelt
ki, aki egyértelműen megállapította, hogy a kérdéses aláírásokat minden
kétséget kizáróan Tocsik Márta készítette. Értesülésünk szerint az
ügyben soha nem született ítélet; a közkegyelem miatt az eljárást
megszüntették, a tanácsadó ezért büntetlen előéletűnek tekintendő.
---------------------- idézet vége -----------------------
-- 
-- Olivier Clary   mailto:   http://www.geocities.com/Paris/1326/
Me'te'o-France/CNRM/Groupe Mode'lisation pour Assimiln. et Pre'vision, Toulouse
Aussi loin qu'est l'orient de l'occident, Il met loin de moi mes fautes --Ps103
Se nem kicsi, se nem nagy, / E'ppen hozza'm valo' vagy!  (Lakodalmas -Te'ka e.)

Wally's opening stupidity (usual style and size):

> A ten-watt lightbulb is brighter than this student.

And has the same amount of brain as you.

> I returned to my "usual insult-attack style" But then again, I'm good at it,

No you are not. You are just stupid enough to do it.

> it entertains me,

I believe that. I laugh at you, too.

> and everyone needs a trivial pursuit once in a while

If that's what turns you on, enjoy.

Wally Keeler sunk back to nursery school (from his usual second grade level):

>A mule in heat has more eloquence than you.

The Master answers the child's cries, putting it in a way supposedly 
understandable by the kid:

|The only appropriate answer can be:
|False, but it has more brains than you. (Based on your posts.)

> What incredible wit!!! NOT. What a zinger!!! NOT.
> "...it has more brains than you." typical szar-chasm of an elementary school 
> yard -- pre-sophomoronic level. Tsk tsk tsk.
> You have about as much myopic insight into witty come backs as an 
> orrSZARvu in a glass factory.

Here is the explanation of Wally's cluelessness: If a statement does not 
contain any curse words, he can not comprehend it. And you ask for creativity, 
metaphors and all that jazz! Sourpuss.


|And the only appropoetic answer:
|             ^^^^^^^^^^^\
|                         \ For the new ones: I borrowed that from Wally
|                          \ cause he keeps asking for it.

> Actually you expoetriated it from Wally.

No, I borrowed it from you. You're hallucinating again.

> And you only deliver inappropoetic answers:

I know, I know: no curse words, not good for Wally. I understand.


|                      ****************************
|                      * Practice that gold trick * 
etc. etc.

>    DOGGEREL

Still beats the hell out of your  'Wordscrapers'.

>The world is weary 

Yet you're the only one whining.

>of the squandering of bandwidth on such crap from one GK 
>who knowingly admits to not being a poet, has never been published by any 
>third party, hasn't a clue about verbal creativity, nor the "associative 
>qualities of true poetry"

You are obviously clueless about any true poetry yourself.

> and finds it excrutiating to be reminded of such 
>from one who has received such authentification as a poet. 

Geez, who would that be?

> So how to grade such trash as GK's doggerel? 
> What about a b-plus?
> No, no, no, that would offer encouragement.
> I think a b-anal would be more appropoetic justice.

I am very glad you did not like it. It means it must be really good.
You are very obsessed with your anality. But if that's your pleasure ...

> How flatteringly sweet to know that I had inspired this young man to spend 
> such energy to make an attempt at the art of poetry. 

It was fun. You should try poetry, too, you don't know what 
you're missing!

> But since it was submitted for appraisal,

It was not. You are too full of yourself if you think anyone desires 
your attempt of evaluation.

> we must be fair.

You still have to figure out how to do that.

> Having had my 
> shots last week I felt confident that I could read through it without 
> consequence. Regretably, I can come to no other conclusion than that it 
> contains an inordinate amount of toxic waste and post-nutritive disposal 
> substance known as Doggerel.

I am glad you did not like this either. It must be really really good.

> Therefore, by the power wasted in me by the Proletariat of the Peoples 
> Republic of Pseudo-Poetry, ... ... ... ... Bla, bla, bla

By now kiddo, keep sucking your thumb. Your creativity is not convincing, 
so you can quit bragging about it now. 
GK